Presumptions and Conjectures in Leibniz’s Legal Theory

In Matthias Armgardt, Patrice Canivez & Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet (eds.), Past and Present Interactions in Legal Reasoning and Logic. Cham, Switzerland: Springer (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Who is Presumed Innocent of What by Whom?Carl-Friedrich Stuckenberg - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (2):301-316.
Presumptions and Fictions: A Collingwoodian Approach.Raymundo Gama - 2015 - In William Twining & Maksymilian Del Mar (eds.), Legal Fictions in Theory and Practice. Cham: Springer Verlag.
The public face of presumptions.Karen Petroski - 2008 - Episteme 5 (3):pp. 388-401.
Legal reasoning and legal theory revisited.Fernando Atria - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
Leibniz.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1972 - Garden City, N.Y.,: Anchor Books.
Leibniz: a collection of critical essays.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1976 - Notre Dame [Ind.]: University of Notre Dame Press.
An Early Theory of Contingency in Leibniz.Samuel Murray - 2017 - Studia Leibnitiana 47 (2):205-219.
The principle of continuity and Leibniz's theory of consciousness.Larry M. Jorgensen - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (2):pp. 223-248.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-19

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references