Infinite regress arguments and the problem of universals

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 52 (3):191 – 201 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is it for a particular to have a property? many proposed analyses of this situation may be called relational accounts. The particular has some relation, R, To some entity p. R may be the relation of falling under, Being a member of, Resembling or "participating." p may be a predicate, A concept, A class, A paradigm instance or a form. A number of arguments seek to prove that all these accounts are involved in various vicious infinite regresses. These arguments are classified, Their resemblances and differences noted, And their soundness assessed. (edited)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
255 (#76,670)

6 months
13 (#184,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Thinking and Experience. [REVIEW]Norman Malcolm - 1954 - Philosophical Review 63 (1):93-98.

Add more references