Between Biochemists and Embryologists – The Biochemical Study of Embryonic Induction in the 1930s

Journal of the History of Biology 45 (1):65-108 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The discovery by Hans Spemann of the “organizer” tissue and its ability to induce the formation of the amphibian embryo’s neural tube inspired leading embryologists to attempt to elucidate embryonic inductions’ underlying mechanism. Joseph Needham, who during the 1930s conducted research in biochemical embryology, proposed that embryonic induction is mediated by a specific chemical entity embedded in the inducing tissue, surmising that chemical to be a hormone of sterol-like structure. Along with embryologist Conrad H. Waddington, they conducted research aimed at the isolation and functional characterization of the underlying agent. As historians clearly pointed out, embryologists came to question Needham’s biochemical approach; he failed to locate the hormone he sought and eventually abandoned his quest. Yet, this study finds that the difficulties he ran into resulted primarily from the limited conditions for conducting his experiments at his institute. In addition, Needham’s research reflected the interests of leading biochemists in hormone and cancer research, because it offered novel theoretical models and experimental methods for engaging with the function of the hormones and carcinogens they isolated. Needham and Waddington were deterred neither by the mounting challenges nor by the limited experimental infrastructure. Like their colleagues in hormone and cancer research, they anticipated difficulties in attempting to establish causal links between complex biological phenomena and simple chemical triggering.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beyond Darwinism’s Eclipse: Functional Evolution, Biochemical Recapitulation and Spencerian Emergence in the 1920s and 1930s.Rony Armon - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):173-194.
Beyond Darwinism’s Eclipse: Functional Evolution, Biochemical Recapitulation and Spencerian Emergence in the 1920s and 1930s. [REVIEW]Rony Armon - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):173 - 194.
Embryonic Development and Induction. [REVIEW]F. J. Dore - 1939 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 14 (3):510-511.
Herbrand's theorem and term induction.Matthias Baaz & Georg Moser - 2006 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (4):447-503.
Embryology and Evolution 1920-1960: Worlds Apart?Ron Amundson - 2000 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 22 (3):335 - 352.
The Background to Otto Warburg's Conception of the "Atmungsferment".Robert E. Kohler - 1973 - Journal of the History of Biology 6 (2):171 - 192.
Hume and Aristotle on Induction: A Comparative Study.Paolo C. Biondi - 2014 - In Paolo C. Biondi & Louis F. Groarke (eds.), Shifting the Paradigm: Alternative Perspectives on Induction. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 51-122.
The Evolution of Epigenetics.Gary Felsenfeld - 2014 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 57 (1):132-148.
Justification of Induction: Russell and Jin Yuelin. A Comparative Study.Chen Bo - 2012 - History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (4):353-378.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
24 (#617,476)

6 months
6 (#417,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?