Review of Sherrilyn Roush, Tracking Truth: Knowledge, Evidence and Science [Book Review]

Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (7) (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Précis of Tracking Truth.Sherrilyn Roush - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (1):213-222.
Does Roush show that evidence should be probable?Damien Fennell & Nancy Cartwright - 2010 - Synthese 175 (3):289 - 310.
Recursive tracking versus process reliabilism.Alvin I. Goldman - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (1):223-230.
A challenge to positive relevance theorists: Reply to Roush.Peter Achinstein - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (4):521-524.
Sherrilyn Roush: Tracking truth: Knowledge, evidence, and science. [REVIEW]Howard Sankey - 2007 - Review of Metaphysics 61 (1):158-159.
Précis of tracking truth.Sherrilyn Roush - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (1):213-222.
Discussion note: Positive relevance defended.Sherrilyn Roush† - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (1):110-116.
Tracking truth: knowledge, evidence, and science.Sherrilyn Roush - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
65 (#243,968)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Horacio Arlo-Costa
Last affiliation: Carnegie Mellon University

Citations of this work

Saving Sensitivity.Brett Topey - 2022 - Philosophical Quarterly 72 (1):177-196.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references