Science & Education 28 (1-2):63-85 (2019)
AbstractLearning the unique linguistic forms and structures that construct and communicate scientific principles, knowledge, and beliefs is important for developing students’ disciplinary literacy. The use of scientific language is apparent in the texts that scientists produce to communicate their findings to other scientists—the research articles. Texts are underused in the science classroom and the texts that students do read often do not reflect the core attributes of authentic scientific reasoning. Adapted primary literature refers to an educational genre that enables the use of scientific articles in high school. In the adaptation process, the language of the article is changed to make it more accessible for high school students. Here, we present a systemic functional linguistics analysis of an APL article compared to the original research article and to a popular article. The three texts were systematically scanned and compared for specific lexicogrammatical items that characterize five linguistic features of scientific writing: informational density, abstraction, technicality, authoritativeness, and hedging. We found that the adaptation process lowered the lexical complexity, while retaining the authenticity of the scientific writing. APL articles, as suggested by the linguistic analysis presented here, may serve as models of scientific reasoning and communication and may promote students’ language awareness and disciplinary literacy. We suggest using APL articles as an apprenticeship genre, for learning about the unique features of authentic scientific texts, and the reasoning that is reflected in the way the articles are written.
Similar books and articles
Lacan: An Adapted Approach to Postmodern Language.Elvis Buckwalter - 2007 - Essays in Philosophy 8 (1):4.
Diagnosis and management of dementia in primary care at an early stage: The need for a new concept and an adapted procedure.Jan De Lepeleire & Jan Heyrman - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (3):213-226.
Language for Learning in the Primary School: A Practical Guide for Supporting Pupils with Language and Communication Difficulties Across the Curriculum.Sue Hayden & Emma Jordan - 2015 - Routledge.
Tragic Thoughts at the End of Philosophy: Language, Literature, and Ethical Theory.Gerald L. Bruns - 1999 - Northwestern University Press.
On ZhuXi's Doctrine of "Nature 'Voice".Shi-jin Li - 2005 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 6:53-56.
King Lear and the Naked Truth: Rethinking the Language of Religion and Resistance.Judy Kronenfeld - 1998 - Duke University Press.
Literature and the construction of reality.Venkat Ramanan - 2018 - Literature & Aesthetics 28 (1):67-86.
Studying social power in textual data: combining tools for analyzing meaning and positioning.Alexandra Bogren - 2010 - Critical Discourse Studies 7 (1):73-84.
Should Threatened Languages Be Conserved?Susan Feldman - 2004 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (1):69-76.
Poetry of Zebras (adapted from "Likeness & Language").Michael Joseph Winkler - 2010 - RAMPIKE Magazine 19 (#1):4-7.
Comparing the Impact of Two Science-as-Inquiry Methods on the NOS Understanding of High-School Biology Students.Dina Tsybulsky - 2018 - Science & Education 27 (7-8):661-683.
The Romance of Origins Language and Sexual Difference in Middle English Literature.Gayle Margherita - 1994
The Primary Language of Poetry in the 1640'sThe Primary Language of Poetry in the 1740's and 1840's.John Arthos & Josephine Miles - 1951 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 10 (1):80.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks.Clark A. Chinn & Betina A. Malhotra - 2002 - Science Education 86 (2):175-218.
How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy.Stephen P. Norris & Linda M. Phillips - 2003 - Science Education 87 (2):224-240.
The structure of a scientific paper. Commentary. Authors' reply.Frederick Suppe, P. Lipton, A. Franklin & C. Howson - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (3):381-424.
Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective.Zhihui Fang - 2005 - Science Education 89 (2):335-347.