Engels’ Fourfold Revenge: On the Implications of Neglecting Engelsian Dialectics in Science, Philosophy, Ecology, and Revolutionary Practice

Marxism and Sciences 1 (1):13–35 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper confronts the familiar prejudice in Western Marxism that Engels’ thought, as articulated in Anti-Duhring and the Dialectics of Nature, is of marginal interest and should be excised from Marxist theory. I argue that this view is mistaken. If we do not take seriously his insights about science, philosophy, nature, and history, his insights will take a fourfold revenge upon us. Natural science takes its revenge by unleashing technology that subjugates us in ways we cannot anticipate, understand or control. Philosophy, in turn, takes revenge on science for neglecting the philosophical presuppositions of its own worldview. Nature itself takes its revenge upon those who consider it to be some formless and passive matter, deprived of history and negativity, responding to our productive activity in surprising ways that, without a rational form of regulation, could lead to our own extinction. Lastly, history takes revenge on those ‘well intentioned’ actors who try to impose their will upon it without a scientific knowledge of its internal, necessary, and objective forces.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Friedrich Engels and Dialectics of Nature.Kaan Kangal - 2020 - London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Engels’ Intentions in Dialectics of Nature.Kaan Kangal - 2019 - Science and Society 83 (2):215-243.
Marx and Engels on Planetary Motion.Kaan Kangal - 2018 - Beiträge Zur Marx-Engels-Forschung. Neue Folge 1 (2016/17):202-224.
Fallacy or Truth?-A Reaction to Censure.Zhong-hua He - 2008 - Modern Philosophy 3:22-28.
Engels’s Conception of Dialectics in the Plan 1878 of Dialectics of Nature.Kaan Kangal - 2021 - In Reexamining Engels’s Legacy in the 21st Century. pp. 69-90.
Carchedi's Dialectics: A Critique.Kaan Kangal - 2017 - Science and Society 81 (3):427-436.
Engels' Great Book.B. M. Kedrov - 1971 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 10 (1):3-26.
Friedrich Engels and the technoscientific reproducibility of life.H. A. E. Zwart - 2020 - Science and Society : A Journal of Marxist Thought and Analysis 84 (3):369- 400.
Marx and Wittgenstein on Religion.Robert Vinten - 2021 - In Moira De Iaco, Gabriele Schimmenti & Fabio Sulpizio (eds.), Wittgenstein and Marx. Marx and Wittgenstein. Berlin: Peter Lang. pp. 153-165.
The Analysis of Historical Dialectics on Marxist Ecological Thought.Jianxia Cui - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 11:25-28.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-13

Downloads
282 (#69,001)

6 months
83 (#50,883)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rogney Piedra Arencibia
Queen's University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Being and nothingness.Jean-Paul Sartre - 1956 - Avenel, N.J.: Random House.
The dialectical biologist.Richard Levins - 1985 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Edited by Richard C. Lewontin.
The Two Cultures.C. P. Snow & Stefan Collini - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 16 references / Add more references