Proof-theoretic strengths of weak theories for positive inductive definitions

Journal of Symbolic Logic 83 (3):1091-1111 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ordinal analysis of non-monotone-definable inductive definitions.Wolfram Pohlers - 2008 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 156 (1):160-169.
A note on theories for quasi-inductive definitions.Riccardo Bruni - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (4):684-699.
The strength of extensionality I—weak weak set theories with infinity.Kentaro Sato - 2009 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 157 (2-3):234-268.
Functional interpretation and inductive definitions.Jeremy Avigad & Henry Towsner - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (4):1100-1120.
Revisiting Dummett's Proof-Theoretic Justification Procedures.Hermógenes Oliveira - 2017 - In Pavel Arazim & Tomáš Lávička (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2016. London: College Publications. pp. 141-155.
Ordinal diagrams for Π3-reflection.Toshiyasu Arai - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (3):1375 - 1394.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-25

Downloads
18 (#811,325)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Proof-theoretic investigations on Kruskal's theorem.Michael Rathjen & Andreas Weiermann - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 60 (1):49-88.
A new system of proof-theoretic ordinal functions.W. Buchholz - 1986 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 32:195-207.
Bar induction and ω model reflection.Gerhard Jäger & Thomas Strahm - 1999 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 97 (1-3):221-230.

Add more references