Logical and semantic purity

ProtoSociology 25:36-48 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many mathematicians have sought ‘pure’ proofs of theorems. There are different takes on what a ‘pure’ proof is, though, and it’s important to be clear on their differences, because they can easily be conflated. In this paper I want to distinguish between two of them.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
87 (#191,321)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Arana
Université de Lorraine

Citations of this work

On the relationship between plane and solid geometry.Andrew Arana & Paolo Mancosu - 2012 - Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):294-353.
Modularity in mathematics.Jeremy Avigad - 2020 - Review of Symbolic Logic 13 (1):47-79.
A Reverse Analysis of the Sylvester-Gallai Theorem.Victor Pambuccian - 2009 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 50 (3):245-260.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references