Argument Structures in Legal Interpretation: Balancing and Thresholds

In Christian Dahlman & Thomas Bustamante (eds.), Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation. Cham: Springer ()
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Construction of Constitutional Rights.Robert Alexy - 2010 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 4 (1):21-32.
Genealogies of Balancing as Discourse.Jacco Bomhoff - 2010 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 4 (1):109-139.
Anti-Theoretical Claims About Legal Interpretation: The Argument Behind the Fallacy.Thomas Bustamante - 2015 - In Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation. Cham: Springer Verlag.
The Three Types of Aim-based Legal Arguments.Liang Qing-Yin - unknown
Arguments and cases: An inevitable intertwining. [REVIEW]David B. Skalak & Edwina L. Rissland - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1):3-44.
E Contrario Reasoning: The Dilemma of the Silent Legislator.Henrike Jansen - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):485-496.
Balancing, Subsumption, and the Constraining Role of Legal Text: An Academic Comment on: The Construction of Constitutional Rights by Robert Alexy.Frederick Schauer - 2010 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 4 (1).
Balancing, the global and the local: Judicial balancing as a problematic topic in comparative (constitutional) law.Jacco Bomhoff - unknown
The Nine Lives of Legal Interpretation.Bruce Anderson - 2010 - Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis 5:30-36.
Richard Markovits, Matters of Principle: Legitimate Legal Argument and Constitutional Interpretation:Matters of Principle: Legitimate Legal Argument and Constitutional Interpretation.David A. Reidy - 2000 - Ethics 110 (4):851-853.
Revisiting the Contribution of Literal Meaning to Legal Meaning.Brian Flanagan - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (2):255-271.
An investigation of the "randomness" of threshold measurements.Michael Wertheimer - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (5):294.
On Legal Inferentialism. Toward a Pragmatics of Semantic Content in Legal Interpretation?Damiano Canale & Giovanni Tuzet - 2007 - Ratio Juris 20 (1):32-44.
On Legal Inferentialism. Toward a Pragmatics of Semantic Content in Legal Interpretation?Giovanni Tuzet Damiano Canale - 2007 - Ratio Juris 20 (1):32-44.
Limited ink : interpreting and misinterpreting GÜdel's incompleteness theorem in legal theory.Karen Crawley - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references