Indestructibility and stationary reflection

Mathematical Logic Quarterly 55 (3):228-236 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If κ < λ are such that κ is a strong cardinal whose strongness is indestructible under κ -strategically closed forcing and λ is weakly compact, then we show thatA = {δ < κ | δ is a non-weakly compact Mahlo cardinal which reflects stationary sets}must be unbounded in κ. This phenomenon, however, need not occur in a universe with relatively few large cardinals. In particular, we show how to construct a model where no cardinal is supercompact up to a Mahlo cardinal in which the least supercompact cardinal κ is also the least strongly compact cardinal, κ 's strongness is indestructible under κ -strategically closed forcing, κ 's supercompactness is indestructible under κ -directed closed forcing not adding any new subsets of κ, and δ is Mahlo and reflects stationary sets iff δ is weakly compact. In this model, no strong cardinal δ < κ is indestructible under δ -strategically closed forcing. It therefore follows that it is relatively consistent for the least strong cardinal κ whose strongness is indestructible under κ -strategically closed forcing to be the same as the least supercompact cardinal, which also has its supercompactness indestructible under κ -directed closed forcing not adding any new subsets of κ

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some remarks on indestructibility and Hamkins? lottery preparation.Arthur W. Apter - 2003 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 42 (8):717-735.
Semistationary and stationary reflection.Hiroshi Sakai - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (1):181-192.
Full reflection at a measurable cardinal.Thomas Jech & Jiří Witzany - 1994 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (2):615-630.
An equiconsistency for universal indestructibility.Arthur W. Apter & Grigor Sargsyan - 2010 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (1):314-322.
On a problem of Foreman and Magidor.Arthur W. Apter - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (4):493-498.
Club-guessing, stationary reflection, and coloring theorems.Todd Eisworth - 2010 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (10):1216-1243.
Generic compactness reformulated.Bernhard König - 2004 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 43 (3):311-326.
Simultaneous reflection and impossible ideals.Todd Eisworth - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (4):1325-1338.
Reducing the consistency strength of an indestructibility theorem.Arthur W. Apter - 2008 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 54 (3):288-293.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
40 (#388,897)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Indestructibility, HOD, and the Ground Axiom.Arthur W. Apter - 2011 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 57 (3):261-265.
Indestructibility and the linearity of the Mitchell ordering.Arthur W. Apter - 2024 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 63 (3):473-482.
Indestructibility and destructible measurable cardinals.Arthur W. Apter - 2016 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 55 (1-2):3-18.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Strong axioms of infinity and elementary embeddings.Robert M. Solovay - 1978 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 13 (1):73.
The lottery preparation.Joel David Hamkins - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 101 (2-3):103-146.
Gap forcing: Generalizing the lévy-Solovay theorem.Joel David Hamkins - 1999 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):264-272.
Saturated ideals.Kenneth Kunen - 1978 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 43 (1):65-76.

View all 9 references / Add more references