Synthese 198 (Suppl 25):6201-6224 (2019)

Abstract
Successful instances of interdisciplinary collaboration can eventually enter a process of disciplinarisation. This article analyses one of those instances: agent-based computational social science, an emerging disciplinary field articulated around the use of computational models to study social phenomena. The discussion centres on how, in knowledge transfer dynamics from traditional disciplinary areas, practitioners parsed several epistemic resources to produce new foundational disciplinary shared commitments, and how disagreements operated as a mechanism of differentiation in their production. Two parsing processes are examined to illustrate this claim. The first one is the parsing of the qualitative–quantitative dualism, arguably the most important methodological disagreement in social science. The second one is the parsing of prediction, a key value in contemporary science. The analysis evidences that disagreements have fostered both external and internal dynamics of differentiation in agent-based computational social science. The former have permitted a more efficient use of epistemic resources, whereas the latter have forced practitioners to modify the foundational narrative and the agenda of the field.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2021
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-019-02438-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,114
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News.David Christensen - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):187-217.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Epistemologia różnicy zdań.Celina Głogowska - 2014 - Filo-Sofija 14 (27):129-140.
Simulation and Architecture: Mapping Building Information Modeling.Nathalie Bredella - 2019 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 27 (4):419-441.
Disagreement-Based Skepticism.Diego E. Machuca - 2017 - Syndicate Philosophy 1 (1).
Scientific Knowledge-Building and Healing Processes.Jean-Pierre Courtial - 2011 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 32 (2):113-122.
The Scientific and the Ethical.Bernard Williams - 1984 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 17:209-228.
Rejoinder to Ralph Weber.Xiao Ouyang - 2017 - Philosophy East and West 68 (1):261-263.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-11-12

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes