Personality traits and bricolage as drivers of sustainable social responsibility in family SMEs: A COVID‐19 perspective
Business and Society Review 126 (1):37-68 (2021)
AbstractMotivated by the social and environmental challenges resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, this research examines the influence of the “big five” personality traits; extroversion, agreeableness, openness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism on sustainable social responsibility with a mediating role of bricolage. We collected empirical evidence from 245 family-owned SMEs. The results indicate that the personality traits do not directly influence sustainable social responsibility, although the traits (except extroversion) influence bricolage. Moreover, we found that open, conscious, and agreeable personalities indirectly contribute to sustainable social responsibility, with bricolage as a mediator. Our findings encourage enterprises to focus on those personality traits during crises (especially COVID-19) that empower people to effectively manage existing resources (e.g., bricolage) and protect their stakeholders. Family-owned SMEs need to assign resource utilization tasks to family members having personalities of openness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism because these kinds of people have high capacities for bricolage.
Similar books and articles
Practice and politics: Ethics and social responsibility in SMEs in the European Union.Laura J. Spence & Francesco Perrini - 2014 - African Journal of Business Ethics 4 (2):20.
Why and How Does Social Responsibility Differ Among SMEs? A Social Capital Systemic Approach.Cristina Aragón, Lorea Narvaiza & Maite Altuna - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 138 (2):365-384.
Investigating Stakeholder Theory and Social Capital: CSR in Large Firms and SMEs.Angeloantonio Russo & Francesco Perrini - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 91 (2):207-221.
SMEs and CSR Theory: Evidence and Implications from an Italian Perspective.Francesco Perrini - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 67 (3):305-316.
In Search of Sustainable Behaviour: The Role of Core Values and Personality Traits.Joel Marcus & Jason Roy - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 158 (1):63-79.
Corporate social responsibility for SMEs: A proposed hypothesised model.Venter E. Turyakira P. - 2012 - African Journal of Business Ethics 6 (2):106.
Responsibility and Informal CSR in Formal Cameroonian SMEs.Geert Demuijnck & Hubert Ngnodjom - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 112 (4):-653-665.
Beyond Size: Predicting Engagement in Environmental Management Practices of Dutch SMEs.Lorraine M. Uhlaner, Marta M. Berent-Braun, Ronald J. M. Jeurissen & Gerrit de Wit - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (4):411-429.
Corporate social responsibility for SMEs: A proposed hypothesised model.Peter Turyakira, Elmarie Venter & Elroy Smith - 2012 - African Journal of Business Ethics 6 (2):106.
Does Intraindividual Variability of Personality States Improve Perspective Taking? An Ecological Approach Integrating Personality and Social Cognition. [REVIEW]Richard Wundrack, Julia Prager, Eva Asselmann, Garret O'Connell & Jule Specht - 2018 - Journal of Intelligence 6:18.
The Influence of Personality Traits and Demographic Factors on Social Entrepreneurship Start Up Intentions.Joyce Koe Hwee Nga & Gomathi Shamuganathan - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (2):259-282.
Against the Character Solution to the Problem of Moral Luck.Robert J. Hartman - 2020 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98 (1):105-118.
Conciliating Work and Family: A Catholic Social Teaching Perspective.Gregorio Guitián - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 88 (S3):513-524.
Sector as personality: The case of farm protest movements. [REVIEW]Luther Tweeten - 1987 - Agriculture and Human Values 4 (1):66-74.
What about sex differences? An adaptationist perspective on “the lines of causal influence” of personality systems.Kevin MacDonald - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):530-531.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Microempresa y la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial Aplicada.Jorge Mendoza-Woodman - 2022 - Human Review. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades 11 (Monográfico):1-13.
References found in this work
Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. [REVIEW]Elisabet Garriga & Domènec Melé - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):51-71.
The Savage Mind.Alasdair MacIntyre & Claude Levi-Strauss - 1967 - Philosophical Quarterly 17 (69):372.
A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Fresh Perspective into Theory and Practice.Dima Jamali - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):213-231.
CEO incentives and corporate social performance.Jean McGuire, Sandra Dow & Kamal Argheyd - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 45 (4):341 - 359.
Board Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Meta-Analytic Investigation.Edeltraud M. Guenther, Thomas W. Guenther, Charl de Villiers & Jan Endrikat - 2021 - Business and Society 60 (8):2099-2135.