AbstractI argue that the two criteria traditionally identified as jointly sufficient for voluntary behavior according to Aristotle require qualification. Without such qualification, they admit troubling exceptions. Through minding these difficult examples, I conclude that a third condition mentioned by Aristotle – the eph' hēmin – is key to qualifying the original two criteria. What is eph' hēmin is that which is efficiently caused by appetite and teleologically caused by reason such that the agent could have, in theory, acted differently. I propose that praise and blame are justified only when 1: the behavior is voluntary and 2: the agent is susceptible to the positive influences of appropriate praise and blame to help form, improve, or strengthen a good character. Through concentrating on the agent's affectability in morally salient situations, we may better understand the qualified criteria's role in voluntary human behavior in general.
Similar books and articles
Agency and Responsibility in Aristotle's Eudemian Ethics.Jozef Müller - 2015 - Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy 60 (2):206-251.
“Listening to Reason”: The Role of Persuasion in Aristotle’s Account of Praise, Blame, and the Voluntary.Allen Speight - 2005 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 38 (3):213-225.
Aristotle and chrysippus on the psychology of human action: Criteria for responsibility.Priscilla K. Sakezles - 2007 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2):225 – 252.
Why There Are No Fresh Starts in Metaphysics Epsilon or Nicomachean Ethics III 5.Tim O'Keefe - manuscript
Aquinas on Non-voluntary Acts.Jeffrey Hause - 2006 - International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (4):459-475.
Ricœur’s Hermeneutics of the Self: On the In-between of the Involuntary and the Voluntary, and Narrative Identity.Gaëlle Fiasse - 2014 - Philosophy Today 58 (1):39-51.
Aristotle on Moral Responsibility: Character and Cause.Meyer Susan Sauvé - 1993 - Blackwell.
Thomas Aquinas on the Will and Moral Responsibility.Jeffrey Peter Hause - 1995 - Dissertation, Cornell University
Analysis and Comparison of the Concept of the Voluntary in Aristotle's Eudemian and Nicomachean Ethics.Joseph Kenneth Casey - 1994 - Dissertation, University of Cincinnati
Character and Blame in Hume and Beyond.Antti Kauppinen - 2016 - In Iskra Fileva (ed.), Questions of Character. Oxford University Press.
Attitudes, Tracing, and Control.Angela M. Smith - 2015 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (2):115-132.
Moral Responsibility and Desert of Praise and Blame.Audrey L. Anton - 2015 - Lanham: Lexington Books.
Los tratamientos de lo involuntario en las Éticas de Aristóteles: una cuestión de métodos.Gabriela Rossi - 2012 - Ideas Y Valores 61 (150):203-228.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Aristotle on learning to be good.Myles F. Burnyeat - 1980 - In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Essays on Aristotle's Ethics. University of California Press. pp. 69--92.
Aristotle on the Voluntary.Susan Sauvé Meyer - 2006 - In Richard Kraut (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. Blackwell. pp. 137-157.
Aristotle’s Compatibilism in the Nicomachean Ethics.Stephen Everson - 1990 - Ancient Philosophy 10 (1):81-103.
Compulsion and voluntary action in the eudemian ethics.Robert Heinaman - 1988 - Noûs 22 (2):253-281.