AbstractThe two Heisenberg Uncertainties entail an incompatibility between the two pairs of conjugated variables E, t and p, q. But incompatibility comes in two kinds, exclusive of one another. There is incompatibility defineable as: & or defineable as [ & ] ↔ r. The former kind is unconditional, the latter conditional. The former, in accordance, is fact independent, and thus a matter of logic, the latter fact dependent, and thus a matter of fact. The two types are therefore diametrically opposed. In spite of this, however, the existing derivations of the Uncertainties are shown here to entail both types of incompatibility simultaneously. ΔEΔt ≥ h is known to derive from the quantum relation E = hv plus the Fourier relation ΔvΔt ≥ 1. And the Fourier relation assigns a logical incompatibility between Δv = 0, Δt = 0. An incompatibility, therefore, which is fact independent and unconditional. How can one reconcile this with the fact that ΔEΔt exists if and only if h > 0, which latter supposition is a factual truth, entailing that a ΔE = 0, Δt = 0 incompatibility should itself be fact dependent? Are we to say that E and t are unconditionally incompatible on condition that E = hv is at all true? Hence, as presently standing, the UR express a self-contradicting type of incompatibility. To circumvent this undesirable result, I reinterpret E = hv as relating the energy with a period. Though only one such period. And not with frequency literally. In this way, the literal concept of frequency does not enter as before, rendering ΔvΔt ≥ 1 inapplicable. So the above noted contradiction disappears. Nevertheless, the Uncertainties are derived. If energy is only to be defined over a period, momentum only over a distance resulting during such period, thus yielding quantized action of dimensions Et = pq, then energies will become indefinite at instants, momenta indefinite at points, leading, as demanded, to ΔEΔt = ΔpΔq ≥ h's.
Similar books and articles
Decision Making : A Quantum Mechanical Analysis Based On Time Evolution of Quantum Wave Function and of Quantum Probabilities During Perception and Cognition of Human Subjects.Elio Conte - 2009 - In Vaxjo University Press (ed.), Proceedings Congress Vaxjo University Conference on Quantum Mechanics. Vaxjo University.
Can Quantum Theory Be Applied to the Universe as a Whole?Claus Kiefer - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (9-10):1410-1418.
Quantum Random Walks and Decision Making.Karthik H. Shankar - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (1):108-113.
Non‐Seperability, Non‐Supervenience, and Quantum Ontology.Darrin W. Belousek - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (4):791-811.
Unificatory Power in the Old Quantum Theory: Informational Relevance of the Quantum Hypothesis.Molly Kao - forthcoming - Philosophy of Science.
Quantum Logic, Realism, and Value Definiteness.Allen Stairs - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (4):578-602.
Quantum Theory, Reconsideration of Foundations 4: Växjö (Sweden), 11-16 June, 2007.Guillaume Adenier (ed.) - 2007 - American Institute of Physics.
Facts and Time in Quantum Mechanics: A Study in Phenomenology and Pragmatics.Michel Bitbol - 2010 - Manuscrito 33 (1):73-121.
Is Quantum Probability Rational?Alasdair I. Houston & Karoline Wiesner - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):291 - 292.
Toward a Physical Theory of Quantum Cognition.Taiki Takahashi - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (1):104-107.
Quantum Mechanics and Metaphysical Indeterminacy.George Darby - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2):227-245.
Time in a Quantum Universe.Peter D. B. Collins & Euan J. Squires - 1993 - Foundations of Physics 23 (6):913-921.
Open Parallel Cooperative and Competitive Decision Processes: A Potential Provenance for Quantum Probability Decision Models.Ian G. Fuss & Daniel J. Navarro - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (4):818-843.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Complementarity.P. K. Feyerabend & D. M. MacKay - 1958 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 32 (1):75-122.
On the Energy-Time Uncertainty Relation. Part I: Dynamical Time and Time Indeterminacy. [REVIEW]Paul Busch - 1990 - Foundations of Physics 20 (1):1-32.
On the Quantum Theory of Sequential Measurements.Paul Busch, Gianni Cassinelli & Pekka J. Lahti - 1990 - Foundations of Physics 20 (7):757-775.
Time as Non‐Observational Knowledge: How to Straighten Out ΔEΔt≥H.Constantin Antonopoulos - 1997 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (2):165 – 183.
A Schism in Quantum Physics or How Locality May Be Salvaged.C. Antonopoulos - 1997 - Philosophia Naturalis 34 (1):33-69.