Grounded Consequence for Defeasible Logic

New York: Cambridge University Press (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a title on the foundations of defeasible logic, which explores the formal properties of everyday reasoning patterns whereby people jump to conclusions, reserving the right to retract them in the light of further information. Although technical in nature the book contains sections that outline basic issues by means of intuitive and simple examples. This book is primarily targeted at philosophers interested in the foundations of defeasible logic, logicians, and specialists in artificial intelligence and theoretical computer science.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2006, 2009

Call number

BC199.D38.A58 2005

ISBN(s)

9780521842051   9780511158902   9780511498411   0521842050   0521122635
View all bargains

Buy this book

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Defeasible Reasoning as a Cognitive Model.G. Aldo Antonelli - 1996 - In Krister Segerberg (ed.), The Parikh Project. Seven Papers in Honour of Rohit. Uppsala Prints & Preprints in Philosophy.
Modelling def+easible reasoning by means of adaptive logic games.Peter Verdée - 2012 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 20 (2):417-437.
Book review To appear in the Bulletin of Symbolic Logic. [REVIEW]G. Aldo Antonelli - 2000 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (4):480-84.
Computational Dialogic Defeasible Reasoning.Robert L. Causey - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):421-450.
Disjunctions and specificity in suppositional defeasible argumentation.G. Bodanza - 2002 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 10 (1):23-49.
Non-monotonic logic.G. Aldo Antonelli - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Defeasible reasoning and logic programming.Timothy R. Colburn - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):417-436.
A directly cautious theory of defeasible consequence for default logic via the notion of general extension.G. Aldo Antonelli - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence 109 (1-2):71-109.
Perspectives in the Interpretation of Defeasible Reasoning.Giacomo Turbanti - 2014 - The Logica Yearbook 2013 2013:239-254.
A Defeasible Logic For Modelling Policy-based Intentions And Motivational Attitudes.Guido Governatori, Vineet Padmanabhan, Antonio Rotolo & Abdul Sattar - 2009 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 17 (3):227-265.
On the relation between vector annotated logic programs and defeasible theories.Kazumi Nakamatsu - 2000 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 8:181.
Well-founded semantics for defeasible logic.Frederick Maier & Donald Nute - 2010 - Synthese 176 (2):243 - 274.
Computing Strong and Weak Permissions in Defeasible Logic.Guido Governatori, Francesco Olivieri, Antonino Rotolo & Simone Scannapieco - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (6):799-829.
Abstract argumentation.Robert A. Kowalski & Francesca Toni - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):275-296.
Relevant logic as a basis for paraconsistent epistemic logics.Gerson Zaverucha - 1992 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 2 (2):225-241.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-06-02

Downloads
57 (#275,739)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

G. Aldo Antonelli
University of California, Davis

Citations of this work

Ideal Reasoners don’t Believe in Zombies.Danilo Fraga Dantas - 2017 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 21 (1):41-59.
Human Rationality Challenges Universal Logic.Brian R. Gaines - 2010 - Logica Universalis 4 (2):163-205.
Modeling Deep Disagreement in Default Logic.Frederik J. Andersen - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Logic.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references