Bioethics 34 (1):81-89 (2020)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
| Keywords | Gene editing, embryo selection, cognitive diversity, liberal eugenics |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Reprint years | 2019 |
| DOI | 10.1111/bioe.12585 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Review of Jonathan Haidt: The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion.Dale E. Miller - unknown
Procreative Beneficence: Why We Should Select the Best Children.Julian Savulescu - 2001 - Bioethics 15 (5-6):413-426.
The Moral Obligation to Create Children with the Best Chance of the Best Life.Julian Savulescu & Guy Kahane - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (5):274-290.
View all 22 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Race, Eugenics, and the Holocaust.Jonathan Anomaly - 2022 - In Ira Bedzow & Stacy Gallin (eds.), Bioethics and the Holocaust. Springer.
Can ‘Eugenics’ Be Defended?Francesca Minerva, Diana S. Fleischman, Peter Singer, Nicholas Agar, Jonathan Anomaly & Walter Veit - 2021 - Monash Bioethics Review 39 (1):60-67.
Why Human Enhancement is Necessary for Successful Human Deep-Space Missions.Konrad Szocik & Martin Braddock - 2019 - The New Bioethics 25 (4):295-317.
Cognitive Enhancement and Network Effects: How Individual Prosperity Depends on Group Traits.Jonathan Anomaly & Garett Jones - 2020 - Philosophia 48:1753-1768.
Similar books and articles
The Moral Imperative to Continue Gene Editing Research on Human Embryos.Julian Savulescu, Jonathan Pugh, Thomas Douglas & Chris Gyngell - 2015 - Protein Cell 6 (7):476–479.
The Ethics of Germline Gene Editing.Gyngell Christopher, Douglas Thomas & Savulescu Julian - 2017 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (4):498-513.
Gene Editing: A View Through the Prism of Inherited Metabolic Disorders.James Davison - 2018 - The New Bioethics 24 (1):2-8.
Cognitive Diversity in the Global Academy: Why the Voices of Persons with Cognitive Disabilities Are Vital to Intellectual Diversity. [REVIEW]Maeve M. O’Donovan - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):171-185.
Ethics and the Risks of Gene Editing.Julian Savulescu & Christopher Gyngell - forthcoming - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal.
Crowdsourcing the Moral Limits of Human Gene Editing?Eric T. Juengst - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (3):15-23.
Human Genome Editing and Ethical Considerations.Kewal Krishan, Tanuj Kanchan & Bahadur Singh - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):597-599.
Diversity as Asset.Andrea Bender, Sieghard Beller & Nancy J. Nersessian - 2015 - Topics in Cognitive Science 7 (4):677-688.
Cognitive Diversity and Moral Enhancement.Chris Gyngell & Simon Easteal - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (1):66-74.
Why Self-Ascriptions Are Difficult and Develop Late.Radu J. Bogdan - 2005 - In B. Malle & S. Hodges. (eds.), Other Minds: How Humans Bridge the Gap Between Self and Others. Guilford Press. pp. 190--206.
The Role of Regulatory RNA in Cognitive Evolution.Guy Barry & John S. Mattick - 2012 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (10):497-503.
Reaching Into Thought: The Minds of the Great Apes.D. Povinelli - 1998 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2 (4):158-159.
Exploring the Minds of the Great Apes: Issues and Controversies.Anne E. Russon & K. A. Bard - 1996 - In A. Russon, Kim A. Bard & S. Parkers (eds.), Reaching Into Thought: The Minds of the Great Apes. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1--22.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-04-06
Total views
1,282 ( #4,221 of 2,499,007 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
70 ( #11,136 of 2,499,007 )
2018-04-06
Total views
1,282 ( #4,221 of 2,499,007 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
70 ( #11,136 of 2,499,007 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
