Hypatia 13 (3):95 - 113 (1998)

Authors
Ann Ferguson
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Abstract
Northern researchers and service providers espousing modernist theories of development in order to understand and aid countries and peoples of the South ignore their own non-universal starting points of knowledge and their own vested interests. Universal ethics are rejected in favor of situated ethics, while a modified empowerment development model for aiding women in the South based on poststructuralism requires building a bridge identity politics to promote participatory democracy and challenge Northern power knowledges
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01372.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,066
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 43 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Re-Thinking Intersectionality.Jennifer C. Nash - 2008 - Feminist Review 89 (1):1-15.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-10

Total views
66 ( #171,845 of 2,498,783 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #170,176 of 2,498,783 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes