Myths of first cause and asymmetries in human evolution

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):208-209 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The causes of asymmetries for handedness and cerebral speech are of scientific interest, but is it sensible to try to determine which of these came first? I argue that (1) first causes belong to mythology, not science; (2) much of the cited evidence is weak; and (3) the treatment of individual differences is inadequate in comparison with the right shift theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Misleading asymmetries of brain structure.Stephen F. Walker - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):240-241.
Arguments in a Sartorial Mode, or the Asymmetries of History and Philosophy of Science.Robert J. Richards - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:482 - 489.
Unity in the wild variety of nature, or just variety?I. C. Mcmanus - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):606-608.
Causal and Explanatory Asymmetry.Daniel M. Hausman - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982 (Volume One: Contributed Papers):43 - 54.
Ontogenetic constraints on the evolution of right-handedness.George F. Michel - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):234-235.
Darwin's legacy and the evolution of cerebral asymmetries.Onur Güntürkün - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):599-600.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
41 (#369,691)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references