Chiasmi International 15:95-109 (2013)

Abstract
Our guiding research hypothesis is as follows: we believe that the significant progress made by the phenomenology of immanence and by the phenomenology of transcendence are not distinguished so much by the positing of new problems as by the reformulation of «the question of the ground of intentionality» that fueled the entire phenomenological tradition. It is striking that, despite the different solutions they offer, these two approaches have the same critical orientation vis-à-vis phenomenology , and they have the task of testing phenomenology in a confrontation with its various «outsides» by according a central place to the «non-intentional.» For it is only by starting from such an enterprise of showing the limits of intentionality that the possibility is opened of a true surpassing of the Husserlian perspective that the given is the measure of all things. To do this, we want to emphasize the positions of Merleau-Ponty and Patočka on this fundamental issue and show that their approaches bear phenomenology, throughits own means, to the threshold of a domain that is no longer the phenomena in the Husserlian sense
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/chiasmi20131512
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,290
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Nature et expérience : convergences entre Whitehead et Merleau-Ponty.Émeline Deroo - 2010 - Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique (2: La nature vivante (Actes n° 2):219-239.
The a Priori of the Visible.James Mensch - 2007 - Studia Phaenomenologica 7:259-283.
Merleau-Ponty En Wittgenstein II.R. G. Kwant - 1970 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 32 (1):3 - 29.
En quel sens peut-on parler d?intentionnalité collective ?Laurent Perreau - 2010 - Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique (8: Questions d'intentionnalité ().
Ricœur lecteur de Patočka.Domenico Jervolino - 2007 - Studia Phaenomenologica 7:201-217.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-02-16

Total views
7 ( #1,071,713 of 2,518,841 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,861 of 2,518,841 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes