The Ecology of Nations: British Imperial Sciences of Nature, 1895-1945

Dissertation, Harvard University (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This thesis focuses on the expansion of ecological research from botanical studies of sand dunes to human ecology within the British Empire. It argues that the correlation between nature's and society's imperial economy---the ecology of nations---was a crucial step in the conceptual and social development of ecological research. Elements of technology, psychology, epistemology, sociology, geography and historiography, as well as the natural sciences, constituted the broad methodological base of ecology. The result was a new ecological order of these 'sciences of nature' which could then establish a new order for both society and nature. Two different patronage networks supported the expansion of ecological reasoning: a small one centering around the South African botanist and politician Jan Christian Smuts, and a larger in the north, encompassing a set of British colonial agencies based in England. Both needed tools for understanding human relations to nature and society in order to set administrative economic policies for landscapes, population settlement and social control. With Arthur George Tansley as their main spokesman British ecologists developed a mechanistic view of ecology suitable for creating an administrative system for human and natural resources in the Empire. In the south, Smuts mobilized ecologists such as John Phillips and John William Bews to use his politics of holism to argue for an idealistic ecology that cold solve the Empire's environmental, social and racial problems. The clash between Tansley's ecosystem approach and Phillips' holistic theory of the biotic community was a formative debate which led to two different approaches to how to include humans in ecological research. In the south, Bews and Phillips explored the ecological division of labor in a racially segregated environment, while Smuts used ecological reasoning to write a racist charter for human rights for the United Nations. In the north, Tansley, Charles Elton, Julian Huxley, Max Nicholson, Edgar Worthington, and H. G. Wells promoted a new human ecology based on principles of economic planning, which Huxley tried to implement as Director General of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Politics of Ecology in South Africa on the Radical Left.Peder Anker - 2004 - Journal of the History of Biology 37 (2):303-331.
China's eco-historian Line in the conceptual framework and research.Li-hua Wang - 2006 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 2:22-32.
Imperial Ecology: Environmental Order in the British Empire, 1895-1945.Peder Anker - 2002 - Journal of the History of Biology 35 (2):392-394.
Making political ecology.Roderick P. Neumann - 2005 - New York: Distributed in the United States of America by Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
1 (#1,884,204)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references