Rettferdige minutter: Fordeling av spilletid i fotballkamper for aldersbestemte klasser

Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1 (1):9-22 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

På et fotballag i overgangen mellom barne- og ungdomsfotballen er spilletid på fotballbanen under kamp både en knapp ressurs og en kilde til diskusjoner om fordeling. Spørsmålet som er utgangspunkt for denne artikkelen, er hvilke hensyn som bør tas når trener og lagleder skal fordele samlet spilletid på enkeltspillere. Er det viktigst å vinne fotballkampen, eller har det størst betydning å fordele spilletiden mest mulig likt mellom spillerne? Skal det tas hensyn til guttenes evner, motivasjon og preferanser? Er deres familiebakgrunn og personlighet av betydning? Diskusjonen baserer seg på en gjennomgang av ulike politiske rettferdighetsteorier for fordeling av knappe goder.Nøkkelord: rettferdighet, practice, fordelingsrettferdighet, diskursetikk, idrettsetikkEnglish summary: Minutes of justice: Distribution of time during football matches in a boys' teamDuring a football match, time for playing can be considered as a limited good. In this article the point of departure is the redistribution of time in a boys' football team in the transition phase between children and youth football. The questions are how and under which conditions time for playing should be distributed among the players. Is winning the game more important than trying to let every player play for an equal amount of time? Should the boys' talents, motivation, and preferences be considered while distributing time, or are family background and personality of importance? Different theories of political justice for the distribution of limited goods underpin the discussion of how to distribute the minutes of playing time during a football match.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Til forsvar for reproduktionen af de sociale klasser.Nicolai von Eggers - 2015 - Slagmark - Tidsskrift for Idéhistorie 72:199-204.
Character Building Thought Power.Ralph Waldo Trine - 2014 - Literary Licensing, LLC.
L'Individualismeo nelle dot trine mo rali del XIX secolo.G. Vidari - 1910 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 18 (3):27-27.
The Assumption of Agency Theory.Kathrine Elizabeth Anker - 2012 - Journal of Critical Realism 11 (4):523-528.
Editorial.Christien van den Anker - 2010 - Journal of Global Ethics 6 (3):219-221.
Editorial.Christien van den Anker - 2011 - Journal of Global Ethics 7 (1):1-3.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-12

Downloads
18 (#814,090)

6 months
11 (#225,837)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

After Virtue.A. MacIntyre - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 46 (1):169-171.
Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality.Michael Walzer - 1983 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (1):63-64.
What is Egalitarianism?Samuel Scheffler - 2003 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (1):5-39.
Justice as fairness.John Rawls - 1958 - Philosophical Review 67 (2):164-194.

View all 10 references / Add more references