3. "presence" and myth

History and Theory 45 (3):328–336 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX


There are no dictionary meanings or authoritative discussions of "presence" that fix the significance of this word in a way that ought to be accepted by anybody using it. So we are in the welcome possession of great freedom to maneuver when using the term. In fact, the only feasible requirement for its use is that it should maximally contribute to our understanding of the humanities. When trying to satisfy this requirement I shall relate "presence" to representation. Then I focus on a variant of representation in which the past is allowed to travel to the present as a kind of "stowaway" , so that the past is literally "present" in historical representation. I appeal to Runia's notion of so-called "parallel processes" for an analysis of this variant of historical representation



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,346

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Presence of Myth.Leszek Kolakowski - 1989 - University of Chicago Press.
The Presence of Myth.John D. Schaeffer - 1990 - New Vico Studies 8:106-108.
The Presence of Myth.Zbigniew Janowski - 1989 - Review of Metaphysics 43 (2):408-409.
Varieties of Presence.Alva Noë - 2012 - Harvard University Press.
Myth upon myth.Susan L. Hurley - 1996 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96 (1):253-260.


Added to PP

37 (#317,779)

6 months
1 (#450,993)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Presence.Eelco Runia - 2006 - History and Theory 45 (1):1–29.

Add more references