The Natural Imperative for Biological Conservation

Conservation Biology 14 (2):373-381 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To contribute significantly to environmental policy of the next century, conservationists will need to reach a consensus on their fundamental values and goals and to persuade society to adopt them. Resolution of the debate over the continued role of naturalness as a guiding concept has important implications for how conservation is practiced and the future of the discipline. I examine five aspects of naturalness in the context of biological conservation: its utility, its assessment, its relation to values and ethics, alternative imperatives, and implications of adopting it as a guiding concept. Naturalness can be viewed as a continuous gradient with completely natural and completely artificial extremes. Human actions are unnatural to the extent that they rely on technology to transform natural ecosystems. The ecological consequences of technological transformation often overwhelm the capacity of other biota to adapt and are a root cause of biodiversity loss. The naturalness of most ecosystems or ecosystem alterations can be assessed objectively despite imperfect knowledge if evolutionary limits and natural ranges of variability are carefully considered. Most conservationists value naturally evolved biotic elements such as genomes and communities over artificial elements. This judgment, which is not shared by society at large, is based on intrinsic and instrumental values, including respect for nature and recognition that many ecosystem amenities stem from natural processes. Given the wide accessibility of ecologically destructive technology, fundamental shifts in societal values and approaches to ecosystem alteration are needed to achieve conservation. Respect for nature must supplant the prevailing world view of human superiority. Although sometimes difficult to assess, naturalness is a more reasonable guide for conservation than are other ecosystem features such as diversity, productivity, or evolution, and naturalness is the foundation for several current conservation concepts such as ecological integrity and ecological restoration. Conservation biologists can help develop conservation practices and ethics that emphasize the importance of natural ecosystems. Key roles include refining distinctions between natural and anthropogenic conditions, devising ways to use ecosystems without losing biotic diversity, and facilitating shifts in societal values toward more respect for nature.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Naturalness in biological conservation.Helena Siipi - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (6):457-477.
Conserving Natural Value.Holmes Rolston - 1994 - Columbia University Press.
Conservation and Individual Worth.Gill Aitken - 1997 - Environmental Values 6 (4):439-454.
The Ethical Foundations of Environmental Conservation and Sustainable Development.Kibaba Makokha - 2013 - Thought and Practice: A Journal of the Philosophical Association of Kenya 5 (2):1-17.
Values, Advocacy and Conservation Biology.Jay Odenbaugh - 2003 - Environmental Values 12 (1):55 - 69.
Environmental philosophy 2.0: Ethics and conservation biology for the 21st century.Jay Odenbaugh - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 45 (1):92-96.
“Only slaves climb trees”.Allyn MacLean Stearman - 1994 - Human Nature 5 (4):339-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-13

Downloads
15 (#919,495)

6 months
8 (#352,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Dimensions of naturalness.Helena Siipi - 2008 - Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 71-103.
Is Natural Food Healthy?Helena Siipi - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (4):797-812.
Synthetic life and the value of life.Erik Persson - 2021 - Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 9.
What is Wrong with Extinction?Erik Persson - 2008 - Dissertation, Lund University
Is Genetically Modified Food Unnatural?Helena Siipi - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (5):807-816.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references