Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):477-483 (2012)

Ignacio Angelelli
University of Texas at Austin
After presenting the ordinary and the Fregean formulations of the ancestral, I raise the question of what is their relationship, the natural candidate being that the Fregean version is an analysans intended to improve upon, and replace, the common notion of ancestral (the analysandum). Next, two types of circles that arise in connection with the Fregean ancestral are presented, and it is claimed that one of the circles makes it impossible to maintain the just described (“replacement”) interpretation. A reference is made to Kerry, who was the first to point out a circularity in Frege’s ancestral. Some of Frege’s remarks are examined in order to tentatively sketch, an answer to the issue of the relationship between ordinary and Fregean ancestral; the latter, if not as an analysans replacing the common notion, can still be seen as a profound enrichment of the former
Keywords Ancestral  analysans  analysandum  Frege  Kerry
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11787-012-0051-z
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,199
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Logical Syntax of Language.Rudolf Carnap - 1937 - London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co..
The Principles of Mathematics. [REVIEW]E. N. - 1938 - Journal of Philosophy 35 (7):191-192.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Is Frege's Definition of the Ancestral Adequate?Richard Heck - 2016 - Philosophia Mathematica 24 (1):91-116.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
100 ( #118,233 of 2,517,926 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #206,126 of 2,517,926 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes