The Rhetoric of Homosexual Practice

Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (4):601-625 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many Protestant denominations have or recently had policies that prohibit “self-avowed practicing homosexuals” from being ordained. By only prohibiting “practicing” homosexuals, proponents of these policies claim that they do not discriminate against homosexuals as a group since, technically, a homosexual can still be ordained as long as she is “non-practicing.” In other words, a condemnation of homosexual practice is not the same as a condemnation of homosexual persons. I argue that this is not the case; the rhetoric of homosexual practice does, in fact, amount to a condemnation of gays and lesbians. It does so by conflating the two things it claims to keep separate—homosexual conduct and homosexual identity. I demonstrate this conflation by analyzing the history of this rhetoric and how it has been adjudicated in church court decisions from the United Methodist Church and the Presbyterian Church (USA)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-10

Downloads
32 (#476,543)

6 months
3 (#928,914)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jack Anderson
Glasgow University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Eschatology, Anthropology, and Sexuality.James M. Childs - 2010 - Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 30 (1):3-20.

Add more references