The Ethics of Managed Care: A Pragmatic Approach

Dissertation, Rice University (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Standard approaches to the ethics of managed care fail to capture the complexity of the phenomenon. In particular, the view that managed care aligns with the business side of a fundamental dichotomy between medicine and business is an obstacle to nuanced analysis and to the construction of an ethic that addresses organizations. A version of pragmatism derived from the work of John Dewey is one basis for a more adequate analysis of the ethics of managed care: a method of inquiry oriented to practice, a compelling social vision of democracy and community, a moral psychology built around a holistic concept of individual character, and an appreciation of the importance of organizations as agencies of character formation. Dewey's concept of character can also be applied to organizations, capturing the total complex of formal and informal structures in their internal relations, and in their relations with the external environment. Deweyan pragmatism provides the tools for an analysis of organizational virtues and an evaluation of organizational structures. This analysis is completed in a case study or "character study" of the way in which virtues are displayed and structures are fitted together in the life of a managed care organization, Kaiser Permanente. Kaiser is not free of ethical problems, but it illustrates some of the ways in which some forms of managed care might improve health and health care and contribute to the development of democracy and community

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ethical impacts of managed care.George W. Rimler & Richard D. Morrison - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (6):493 - 501.
The importance of management for understanding managed care.George G. J. Agich - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (5):518 – 534.
Managed care: How economic incentive reforms went wrong.Madison Powers - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):353-360.
The case for managed care: Reappraising medical and socio-political ideals.George Khushf - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (5):415 – 433.
Conflicts of Interest and Management in Managed Care.George J. Agich & Heidi Forster - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (2):189-204.
What care should be covered?Bernard J. Mansheim - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):331-336.
Managed care and ethical conflicts: anything new?C. Meyers - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (5):382-387.
Health care, human worth and the limits of the particular.C. Cherry - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (5):310-314.
Trust in managed care organizations.Allen Buchanan - 2000 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (3):189-212.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references