The paper discusses the context, substance and likely implications of the European Court of Human Rights’ very recent but, in our view, historic decision in the case of Lautsi v. Italy. The article offers an outline of the case and of the decision’s motivation, a presentation of the responses, and a brief discussion of its relevance to the similar Romanian case. We examine in some detail the objections leveled against the ruling, track the progress of the Court’s relevant jurisprudence on the issue, and suggest some possible consequences.
Keywords freedom of religion, religious manifestations, religious displays, crucifixes, public schools, European Court of Human Rights, rights of the child, margin of appreciation, subsidiarity
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,512
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

[Appeal to Parents].[author unknown] - 1893 - Mind 2 (7):420-424.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation.George Letsas - 2006 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (4):705-732.
The Neutral State and the Mandatory Crucifix.Roland Pierik & Wibren van der Burg - 2011 - Religion and Human Rights 6 (3):259–264.


Added to PP index

Total views
31 ( #371,144 of 2,520,967 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,967 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes