Concordia Law Review 5 (1):134-161 (2020)

Joshua Anderson
Virginia State University
In this article, I identify some good-making features of a deliberative democratic theory. The article will proceed as follows: First, I present both some important insights and some shortcomings of Rawls’ theory. I then present Robert Talisse’s account, focusing on how Talisse both accommodates what is right about Rawls while avoiding some of Rawls’ weaknesses. Finally, some positive claims are made about what an adequate deliberative theory might look like.
Keywords Deliberative Democracy  Pluralism  Rawls  Robert Talisse
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Critique of Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy.Thom Brooks - 2009 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):pp. 50-54.
Deweyan Democracy Defended.David Rondel - 2012 - Southwest Philosophy Review 28 (1):197-207.
A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy.Joshua Forstenzer - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (1):161-164.
A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy (Review).Philip R. Olson - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (4):pp. 631-633.
Does Public Ignorance Defeat Deliberative Democracy?Robert B. Talisse - 2004 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 16 (4):455-463.


Added to PP index

Total views
146 ( #78,837 of 2,497,995 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #32,353 of 2,497,995 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes