In Richard Dietz (ed.), Vagueness and Rationality in Language Use and Cognition. Springer Verlag. pp. 49-59 (2019)

Authors
Chrisoula Andreou
University of Utah
Abstract
This paper concerns regret, where regretting is to be understood, roughly, as mourning the loss of a forgone good. My ultimate aim is to add a new dimension to existing debate concerning the internal logic of regret by revealing the significance of certain sorts of cases—including, most interestingly, certain down-to-earth cases involving vague goals—in relation to the possibility of regret in continued endorsement cases. Intuitively, it might seem like, in continued endorsement cases, an agent’s regret must be tied to the idea that the forgone good is no better than the achieved good but is also not fully made up for by the achieved good because the goods are different in kind. But this view is controversial. After describing a challenge to the view, as well as the main features of the debate regarding regret in which it figures, I appeal first to a fanciful case involving a set of ever-better options, and then to a more down-to-earth case involving a vague goal, to develop a defense of the opposing view that, even in continued endorsement cases, mourning the loss of a forgone good need not be tied to the idea that the loss of the good is not fully made up for by the gain of a preferred or incomparable good of a different kind.
Keywords Cyclic preferences  EverBetter wine  Incomparable goods  Money-pump argument  Monistic theories of the good  Non-fungible goods  Pluralistic theories of the good  Regret  Temptation  Vague goals
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-15931-3_4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,740
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Regret and Moral Maturity: A Response to Michael Ing and Manyul Im.Amy Olberding - 2015 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 14 (4):579-587.
Regret and Obligation.Juha Räikkä - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 12:24-29.
Revelatory Regret and the Standpoint of the Agent.Justin F. White - 2017 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 41 (1):225-240.
Is Agent-Regret Rational?David Sussman - 2018 - Ethics 128 (4):788-808.
The Role of Regret in Medical Decision-Making.Paddy McQueen - 2017 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (5):1051-1065.
Agent-Regret in Our Lives.Jake Wojtowicz - 2019 - Dissertation, King's College London
Value in the Guise of Regret.Carla Bagnoli - 2000 - Philosophical Explorations 3 (2):169 – 187.
Compromise: What Makes It Bad?Nigel Biggar - 2018 - Studies in Christian Ethics 31 (1):34-48.
On Regretting Things I Didn't Do and Couldn't Have Done.Jules Holroyd - 2017 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (3):403-413.
Why You'll Regret Not Reading This Paper.Mark Schroeder - 2019 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 85:135-156.
When Should We Regret?Paddy McQueen - 2017 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (5):608-623.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-06-17

Total views
6 ( #1,114,237 of 2,462,780 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #299,182 of 2,462,780 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes