Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3):475-486 (2015)

Authors
Henrik Andersson
Lund University
Abstract
According to a standard account of incomparability, two value bearers are incomparable if it is false that there holds a positive value relation between them. Due to the vagueness of the comparative predicates it may also be indeterminate as to which relation that holds - for each relation it is neither true nor false that it holds. John Broome has argued that indeterminacy cannot coexist with incomparability and since there seems to exist indeterminacy there cannot exist incomparability. At the core of his argument lies the collapsing principle. There are several arguments against this principle; Erik Carlson has advanced most of these. In this paper two strategies in dealing with these arguments are discussed. One strategy is to deny the existence of a certain kind of properties; another strategy that has been advanced by Christian Constantinescu is to restrict the collapsing principle. In the paper it is argued that the first of these strategies is the most promising strategy. A novel argument in favour of this strategy is presented and several objections to the strategy are rebutted. Finally it is concluded that, even though this strategy deals with most objections, without a better argument in favour of the principle the debate seems to run into a stalemate
Keywords The collapsing principle  Incomparability  Indeterminacy  Vagueness  Value comparison  John Broome  Erik Carlson  Cristian Constantinescu  Johan F. Gustafsson
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-014-9533-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,740
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Value Incomparability and Indeterminacy.Cristian Constantinescu - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (1):57-70.
I—I Ncommensurability and V Agueness.Wlodek Rabinowicz - 2009 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1):71-94.
Vagueness, Incomparability, and the Collapsing Principle.Erik Carlson - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):449-463.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Vague Comparisons.Cristian Constantinescu - 2016 - Ratio 29 (4):357-377.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Vagueness, Incomparability, and the Collapsing Principle.Erik Carlson - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):449-463.
Value Incomparability and Indeterminacy.Cristian Constantinescu - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (1):57-70.
The Small Improvement Argument.Nicolas Espinoza - 2008 - Synthese 165 (1):127 - 139.
Incommensurability or Vagueness? A Comment on Rabinowicz and Sugden.Mozaffar Qizilbash - 2012 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (3pt3):333-338.
Indeterminacy in the Social Sciences.Richard Lichtman - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):139 – 150.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-08-19

Total views
54 ( #201,972 of 2,462,864 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #299,182 of 2,462,864 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes