Legein to What End?

Australasian Philosophical Review 3 (2):176-182 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the 5th century a number of sophists challenged the orthodox understanding of morality and claimed that practicing injustice was the best and most profitable way for an individual to live. Although a number of responses to sophistic immoralism were made, one argument, in fact coming from a pair of sophists, has not received the attention it deserves. According to the argument I call Immortal Repute, self-interested individuals should reject immorality and cultivate virtue instead, for only a virtuous agent can win the sort of everlasting reputation that makes a life truly admirable and successful.

Similar books and articles

Aristotle’s Conception of Truth: An Alternative View.Blake Hestir - 2013 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (2):193-222.
Socrates’ Failure: Language and Lies in Plato’s Apology.Olof Pettersson - 2018 - In Haraldsen Vivil Valvik, Olof Pettersson & Tvedt Oda E. Wiese (eds.), Readings of Plato's Apology of Socrates Defending the Philosophical Life. Lexington. pp. 137-154.
Heidegger on the Nature of Thinking.Gene Dale Moore - 1982 - Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder
Heideggers interpretatie: Van de logos bij herakleitos.R. Bakker - 1969 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 31 (2):290 - 326.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-17

Downloads
148 (#123,920)

6 months
32 (#101,492)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Merrick Anderson
University College London

Citations of this work

Says Who? Modes of Speaking in the Euthydemus.Fiona Leigh - 2019 - Australasian Philosophical Review 3 (2):123-130.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references