I begin with the assumption that a philosophically significant tension exists today in feminist philosophy of religion between those subjects who seek to become divine and those who seek their identity in mutual recognition. My critical engagement with the ambiguous assertions of Luce Irigaray seeks to demonstrate, one the one hand, that a woman needs to recognize her own identity but, on the other hand, that each subject whether male or female must struggle in relation to the other in order to maintain realism about life and death. No one can avoid the recognition that we are each given life but each of us also dies. In addition, I raise a more general, philosophical problem for analytic philosophers who attempt to read Continental philosophy of religion: how should philosophers interpret deliberately ambiguous assertions? For example, what does Irigaray mean in asserting. 'Divinity is what we need to become free, autonomous, sovereign'? To find an answer, I turn to the distinctively French readings of the Hegelian struggle for recognition which have preoccupied Continental philosophers especially since the first half of the last century. I explore the struggle for mutual recognition between womrn and men who must face the reality of life and death in order to avoid the projection of their fear of mortality onto the other sex. This includes a critical look at Irigaray's account of subjectivity and divinity. I turn to the French philosopher Michèle Le Doeuff in order to shift the focus from divinity to intersubjectivity. I conclude that taking seriously the struggle for mutual recognition between subjects forces contemporary philosophers of religion to be realist in their living and dying. With this in mind, the lesson from the Continent for philosophy of religion is that we must not stop yearning for recognition. Indeed, we must event risk our autonomy/divinity in seeking to recognize intersubjectivity.
Keywords Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11153-006-0013-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Undoing Gender.J. Butler - 2004 - Routledge.
The Ethics of Ambiguity.Simone de Beauvoir - 1948 - New York: Philosophical Library.

View all 38 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Intra-Feminist Critique: Modes of Disengagement.Marilyn Frye - 2001 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy (2):85-87.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Continental Anti-Realism: A Critique.Richard Sebold - 2014 - Rowman & Littlefield International.
Unscrambling of Life and Death of Confucius.Zhongqi Yang - 2008 - Philosophy and Culture 35 (3):167-179.
Kierkegaard and Death.Patrick Stokes & Adam Buben (eds.) - 2011 - Indiana University Press.
The Philosophy of Subjectivity From Descartes to Hegel.Marina Bykova - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:147-153.
Chapter Five Subjectivity, Redistribution and Recognition Andy Blunden.Redistribution Subjectivity - 2007 - In Julie Connolly, Michael Leach & Lucas Walsh (eds.), Recognition in Politics: Theory, Policy and Practice. Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 84.
A Little Dialogue On Life And Death.Fulvio Tessitore - 2010 - Archivio di Storia Della Cultura 23.
Death in Our Life.Joseph Raz - 2013 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (1):1-11.


Added to PP index

Total views
125 ( #93,442 of 2,506,365 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,365 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes