Springer International Publishing (2015)

Authors
Hanne Andersen
University of Copenhagen
Nancy Nersessian
Harvard University
Abstract
The book examines the emerging approach of using qualitative methods, such as interviews and field observations, in the philosophy of science. Qualitative methods are gaining popularity among philosophers of science as more and more scholars are resorting to empirical work in their study of scientific practices. At the same time, the results produced through empirical work are quite different from those gained through the kind of introspective conceptual analysis more typical of philosophy. This volume explores the benefits and challenges of an empirical philosophy of science and addresses questions such as: What do philosophers gain from empirical work? How can empirical research help to develop philosophical concepts? How do we integrate philosophical frameworks and empirical research? What constraints do we accept when choosing an empirical approach? What constraints does a pronounced theoretical focus impose on empirical work? Nine experts discuss their thoughts and empirical results in the chapters of this book with the aim of providing readers with an answer to these questions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2015
Buy this book $24.95 used (77% off)   $40.00 new (64% off)   $109.99 from Amazon    Amazon page
ISBN(s) 978-3-319-18599-6   3319356682   3319185993   9783319185996
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-18600-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,379
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
Chapters BETA

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Applying the notion of epistemic risk to argumentation in philosophy of science.Jaana Eigi-Watkin - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (2):1-18.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Anti- Naturalism: The Role of Non-Empirical Methods in Philosophy.Aaron Barth - 2013 - History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (3):196-206.
Philosophy and the Brain Sciences.Peter Machamer & Justin Sytsma - 2009 - Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 1 (2):353-374.
Is the Philosophy of Science Scientific?A. Cornelius Benjamin - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (4):351-358.
Is AI an Empirical Science?André Kukla - 1989 - Analysis 49 (March):56-60.
Philosophy of Science as the Object of Metaphilosophical Investigations.Sergey F. Martynovich - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 46:63-74.
Towards a Philosophy of Chemistry.Joachim Schummer - 1997 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (2):307 - 336.
Vom Nutzen der Historie für die Wissenschaftsphilosophie.Jutta Schickore - 2013 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 36 (1):83-93.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-08-16

Total views
37 ( #309,257 of 2,519,663 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,756 of 2,519,663 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes