Ergodic Axiom: The Ontological Mistakes in Economics

Creative and Knowledge Society 5 (1):47-65 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are several ontological and consequently also methodological mistakes in contemporary mainstream economics. Among them, the so-called ergodic axiom is play significant role. It is understandable that the real economy elaborated as formalized mental model looks like dynamic system on first sight. However, that is right only of dynamical systems in mathematical formalism. Economy that is in our understanding societal and/or collective economy is complex evolving organism. If we imagine such organism in the form of dynamical system that is as clear mathematical formalism, we are losing their crucial authentic character. The significant irredeemable attribute of societal economy is lying in his complex evolving network process character created by large population of people with different decision-making and complex realizing among them. Going from these imaginations the two entities in a question that is dynamical system with their ergodicity and societal economic organism as complex evolving network are qualitative very different ones. That is the reason why we cannot accede with endeavours to draw on living economy straitjacket of ergodic axiom. To articulate that cause by other words ergodic dynamical systems are applicable for physical and partly for chemical entities and only scarcely are fit for living organisms. On the other hand however, as clear method the ergodic dynamical system have good applying for didactical approaches in economics where helping in better understanding some types of complexities in dynamics. The purpose of that essay is to discuss problems around usability of ergodic dynamical system theory and methods in economics in the age of advanced ICT knowledge based society.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ergodic hierarchy.Roman Frigg & Joseph Berkovitz - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Computability of the ergodic decomposition.Mathieu Hoyrup - 2013 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (5):542-549.
The foundational role of ergodic theory.Massimiliano Badino - 2005 - Foundations of Science 11 (4):323-347.
A Constructive View on Ergodic Theorems.Bas Spitters - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (2):611 - 623.
The Generalization of de Finetti's Representation Theorem to Stationary Probabilities.Jan von Plato - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:137 - 144.
Justifying typicality measures of Boltzmannian statistical mechanics and dynamical systems.Charlotte Werndl - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (4):470-479.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-21

Downloads
11 (#1,113,583)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Emergence.John H. Holland - 1997 - Philosophica 59 (1).

Add more references