Complexity effects are found in all relative-clause sentence forms
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):95-95 (1999)
Abstract
We argue that if a different definition of sentence complexity is adopted and processing capacity is assessed in a way that is consistent with that definition, then the Caplan & Waters distinction between interpretive versus postinterpretive processing is unnecessary insofar that it applies to the thematic role assignment in relative-clause sentences.DOI
10.1017/s0140525x99221784
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
'Testimonial' and the formalistic definition - the case for an 'accusatorial' fix.Robert P. Mosteller - manuscript
The influence of clause order, congruency, and probability on the processing of conditionals.Matthew Haigh & Andrew J. Stewart - 2011 - Thinking and Reasoning 17 (4):402 - 423.
The Complexity of Analytic Tableaux.Noriko H. Arai, Toniann Pitassi & Alasdair Urquhart - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (3):777 - 790.
Communication by Ramsey-sentence clause.Herbert G. Bohnert - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (4):341-347.
Agrammatic sentence processing: Severity, complexity, and priming.Herman H. J. Kolk & Robert J. Hartsuiker - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):39-40.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
36 (#326,121)
6 months
1 (#447,139)
2009-01-28
Downloads
36 (#326,121)
6 months
1 (#447,139)
Historical graph of downloads
