Congenitally decorticate children’s potential and rights

Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12):e85-e85 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article is the first indepth ethical analysis of empirical studies that support the claim that children born without major parts of their cerebral cortex are capable of conscious experiences and have a rudimentary capacity for agency. Congenitally decorticate children have commonly been classified as persistently vegetative, with serious consequences for their well-being and opportunities to flourish. The paper begins with an explication of the rights-based normative framework of the argument, including conceptual analysis of the terms ‘agency’, ‘potentiality for agency’ and ‘gradual approach of agency’. It critically examines Alan Gewirth’s account of the criteria for being a rights bearer and principles for settling rights conflicts between agents and potential agents. It then applies the rights-based normative framework to the ethical challenges associated with care for congenitally decorticate children. It argues that recent empirical studies support the claim that the concepts ‘potential for agency’ and ‘capacity for rudimentary agency’ apply to children who are born without major parts of their cerebral cortex. The article finally discusses important medical ethical implications of these results. It specifically focuses on congenitally decorticate children’s preparatory rights to a stimulating intellectual and social environment.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What rights (if any) do children have.Harry Brighouse - 2002 - In David Archard & Colin M. Macleod (eds.), The Moral and Political Status of Children. Oxford University Press. pp. 31--52.
Children’s Rights, Bodily Integrity and Poverty Alleviation.Mar Cabezas & Gunter Graf - 2016 - In Helmut P. Gaisbauer, Gottfried Schweiger & Clemens Sedmak (eds.), Ethical Issues in Poverty Alleviation. Springer. pp. 57-73.
Group Rights and Group Agency.Adina Preda - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (2):229-254.
Capacity, claims and children's rights.Mhairi Cowden - 2012 - Contemporary Political Theory 11 (4):362-380.
Becoming versus being: A critical analysis of the child in liberal theory.Barbara Arneil - 2002 - In David Archard & Colin M. Macleod (eds.), The Moral and Political Status of Children. Oxford University Press. pp. 70--96.
Children and developed agency.Andrew Divers - 2013 - Childhood and Philosophy 9 (18):225-244.
Capacities, Potentialities, and Rights.Anna-Karin Margareta Andersson - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (4):653-665.
Social research in the advancement of children's rights.Sonja Grover - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (1):119-130.


Added to PP

28 (#469,080)

6 months
1 (#874,758)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On a confusion about a function of consciousness.Ned Block - 1995 - Brain and Behavioral Sciences 18 (2):227-–247.
Duties and their direction.Gopal Sreenivasan - 2010 - Ethics 120 (3):465-494.

Add more references