Utilitas 31 (3):334-342 (2019)

Authors
Vuko Andrić
Universität Bayreuth
Abstract
In this article, I critique the moral theory developed in Philip Pettit's The Robust Demands of the Good: Ethics with Attachment, Virtue, and Respect. Pettit's theory, which I label Robust-Goods Consequentialism, aims to avoid the problems but retain the attractive features of traditional consequentialist theories. The distinctive feature of Robust-Goods Consequentialism is a value theory that attempts to accommodate what Pettit calls rich goods: certain moral phenomena that can be categorized under the headings of attachment, virtue and respect. I argue that Robust-Goods Consequentialism fails because it implies very implausible value judgements.
Keywords Consequentialism  Robust goods  Philip Pettit
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0953820819000116
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,944
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory.Iwao Hirose & Jonas Olson (eds.) - 2015 - Oxford University Press USA.
Objective Consequentialism and the Licensing Dilemma.Vuko Andrić - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (3):547-566.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ein Plädoyer für den Rechtsnormen-Konsequentialismus.Vuko Andrić & Martin Kerz - 2014 - Archiv Für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie. Beihef 140:87-98.
On Love’s Robustness.Benjamin Ferguson - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (4):915-925.
Multidimensional Consequentialism and Risk.Vuko Andrić & Attila Tanyi - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (1):49-57.
Practical Rationality for Pluralists About the Good.Chappell Timothy - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (2):161-177.
Is Rule-Consequentialism a Rubber Duck?Brad Hooker - 1994 - Analysis 54 (2):92 - 97.
Objective Consequentialism and the Licensing Dilemma.Vuko Andrić - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (3):547-566.
7 Consequentialism.Douglas W. Portmore - 2011 - In Christian Miller (ed.), Continuum Companion to Ethics. Continuum. pp. 143.
The Value of Robustness: Promotion or Protection?Benjamin Ferguson - 2018 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 5 (1):9-27.
The Demands of Consequentialism.Tim Mulgan - 2001 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-05-24

Total views
32 ( #353,897 of 2,498,137 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #212,593 of 2,498,137 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes