Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation

Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (4):394 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0022280

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Effects of instruction and stimulus presentation on the occurrence of averaging responses in impression formation.Harry F. Gollob & Andrew M. Lugg - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (1):217.
Differential weighting of positive and negative traits in impression formation as a function of prior exposure.Irwin P. Levin, Linda L. Wall, Jeannette M. Dolezal & Kent L. Norman - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (1):114.
Serial position curves in impression formation.Norman H. Anderson - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (1):8.
Sequential effects in impression formation with binary intermittent responding.Irwin P. Levin & Charles F. Schmidt - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (2p1):283.
The nonadditivity of personality impressions.Michael H. Birnbaum - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (3):543.
Averaging model analysis of set-size effect in impression formation.Norman H. Anderson - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (2):158.
A study of concept formation as a function of reinforcement and stimulus generalization.Arnold H. Buss - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (4):494.
Similarity in stimulus material and stimulus task on the formation of a new scale of judgment.M. E. Tresselt - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (3):241.
Implicit impressions.James S. Uleman, Steven L. Blader & Alexander Todorov - 2005 - In Ran R. Hassin, James S. Uleman & John A. Bargh (eds.), The New Unconscious. Oxford Series in Social Cognition and Social Neuroscience. Oxford University Press. pp. 362-392.
Differential influence of information in an impression-formation task with binary intermittent responding.Irwin P. Levin & Charles F. Schmidt - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):374.
Personality impression formation and sex: The polarization effect.Juliet Popper Shaffer - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (6):661-664.
The set-size effect in personality impression formation is not an artifact.Irwin P. Levin & Martin F. Kaplan - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3 (3):187-188.
The relationship between personality impression formation and sex: An application of information integration theory.Wendy Combest, Katherine Kasten & Juliet Popper Shaffer - 1973 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1 (1):2-4.
The Relation between Field Brightness and the Speed of Retinal Impression.P. W. Cobb - 1923 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 6 (2):138.
The Needs of the Needy, or the Needs of the Donors?Nimruji Jammulamadaka - 2012 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 24 (1):37-50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
81 (#202,255)

6 months
10 (#257,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The bored mind is a guiding mind: toward a regulatory theory of boredom.Andreas Elpidorou - 2018 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 17 (3):455-484.
Social Moral Licensing.Wassili Lasarov & Stefan Hoffmann - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 165 (1):45-66.
CSR Communication: An Impression Management Perspective.Jasmine Tata & Sameer Prasad - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 132 (4):765-778.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references