Axiomatic Method and Category Theory

Cham: Imprint: Springer (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This volume explores the many different meanings of the notion of the axiomatic method, offering an insightful historical and philosophical discussion about how these notions changed over the millennia. The author, a well-known philosopher and historian of mathematics, first examines Euclid, who is considered the father of the axiomatic method, before moving onto Hilbert and Lawvere. He then presents a deep textual analysis of each writer and describes how their ideas are different and even how their ideas progressed over time. Next, the book explores category theory and details how it has revolutionized the notion of the axiomatic method. It considers the question of identity/equality in mathematics as well as examines the received theories of mathematical structuralism. In the end, Rodin presents a hypothetical New Axiomatic Method, which establishes closer relationships between mathematics and physics. Lawvere's axiomatization of topos theory and Voevodsky's axiomatization of higher homotopy theory exemplify a new way of axiomatic theory building, which goes beyond the classical Hilbert-style Axiomatic Method. The new notion of Axiomatic Method that emerges in categorical logic opens new possibilities for using this method in physics and other natural sciences. This volume offers readers a coherent look at the past, present and anticipated future of the Axiomatic Method.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is the axiomatic method?Jaakko Hintikka - 2011 - Synthese 183 (1):69-85.
Remarks on Axiomatic Rejection in Aristotle’s Syllogistic.Piotr Kulicki - 2002 - Studies in Logic and Theory of Knowledge 5:231-236.
Mathematical Discourse vs. Mathematical Intuition.Carlo Cellucci - 2005 - In Carlo Cellucci & Donald Gillies (eds.), Mathematical Reasoning and Heuristics. College Publications. pp. 137-165..
What is required of a foundation for mathematics?John Mayberry - 1994 - Philosophia Mathematica 2 (1):16-35.
Theories and Theories of Truth.Ryan Christensen - 2011 - Metaphysica 12 (1):31-43.
Regressive Analysis.Volker Peckhaus - 2002 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 5.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-07

Downloads
49 (#318,154)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrei Rodin
Russian Academy of Sciences

Citations of this work

Pemikiran ateisme Richard Dawkins.Achmad Fadel & Hasan Mujtaba - 2020 - Kanz Philosophia a Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism 6 (2):229-248.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Uber Sinn und Bedeutung.Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik 100 (1):25-50.
What numbers could not be.Paul Benacerraf - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73.
The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences.Eugene Wigner - 1960 - Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics 13:1-14.
Ueber Sinn und Bedeutung (Summary).Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Philosophical Review 1 (5):574-575.
Foundations of Set Theory.Abraham Adolf Fraenkel & Yehoshua Bar-Hillel - 1973 - Atlantic Highlands, NJ, USA: Elsevier.

View all 31 references / Add more references