Authors
Abstract
“Radical The paper provides a survey of arguments for claims that rational agents should have transitive preferences and argues that they are not valid. The presentation is based on a chapter for the forthcoming Oxford Handbook of Rational and Social Choice.
Keywords Conference Proceedings  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI wcp22200822699
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,792
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Rationality of Intransitive Preference: Foundations for the Modern View.Paul Anand - 2009 - In Paul Anand, Prasanta Pattanaik & Clemens Puppe (eds.), Handbook of Rational and Social Choice. Oxford University Press.
Intransitivity and Vague Preferences.Jonathan Aldred - 2007 - The Journal of Ethics 11 (4):377-403.
Where Do Preferences Come From?Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2013 - International Journal of Game Theory 42 (3):613-637.
The Story of Rational Action.J. David Velleman - 1993 - Philosophical Topics 21 (1):229-254.
Why Rational Agents Should Not Be Liberal Maximizers.Isaac Levi - 2008 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (S1):1-17.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-04-04

Total views
63 ( #173,972 of 2,463,132 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #223,428 of 2,463,132 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes