Review essay: Stakes and kidneys: Why markets in human body parts are morally imperative, by James Stacey Taylor

HEC Forum 17 (4):319-322 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s10730-005-5157-8

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Stakes and Kidneys: Why Markets in Human Body Parts are Morally Imperative.David Resnik - 2008 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 5 (1):169-170.
A Litmus Test for Exploitation: James Stacey Taylor's Stakes and Kidneys.J. R. Kuntz - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (6):552-572.
Introduction: Markets and medicine. [REVIEW]James Stacey Taylor - 2006 - Journal of Value Inquiry 40 (2-3):149-154.
The moral limits of markets: The case of human kidneys.Debra Satz - 2008 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (1pt3):269-288.
Review essay: John Meadowcroft, the ethics of the market. [REVIEW]James Stacey Taylor - 2007 - HEC Forum 19 (2):177-182.
Black markets, transplant kidneys and interpersonal coercion.J. S. Taylor - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (12):698-701.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
28 (#538,947)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references