Discriminatory attitude toward vulnerable groups in Singapore: Prevalence, predictors, and pattern

Journal of Behavioral Science 14 (2):15-30 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Presently, there is a lack of psychological and quantitative studies in Singapore about discriminatory attitudes. This paper aimed to contribute to this aspect. However, to examine actual behavior can be difficult due to the sensitive nature of the needed data. Hence, this study approached discrimination at an attitudinal level. Six vulnerable groups were examined in this study. They consisted of people of a different race, immigrants or foreign workers, homosexuals, people living with HIV/AIDS, people of a different religion, and unmarried couples living together. Two research questions were posed: 1) What is the prevalence of having discriminatory attitude toward vulnerable groups? and 2) What are the predictors of these discriminatory attitudes? Using a sample population of 1,972 Singaporeans, descriptive analysis and binomial logistic regression analysis were conducted. Firstly, based on the results, the prevalence ranged between 10.76% to 42.46%. Singaporeans have discriminatory attitude toward vulnerable groups who can be categorized into two: the least discriminated (three groups ranging between 10.76% to 15.48%) and the highly discriminated (three groups ranging between 30.86% to 42.46%). Secondly, binomial logistic regression showed support for several significant predictors such as emphasis on the importance of religion and tradition, and employment status, depending on the model assessed. However, one pattern was observed in all the models, that a person who discriminates one group is more likely to discriminate another group. The findings were then discussed and explained within the context of Singapore.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Religious Discrimination in Childhood and Adolescence.Nastasya Waillet & Isabelle Roskam - 2012 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 34 (2):215-242.
The Priority of Democratic Autonomy Over Discriminatory Religion.Henry E. Cline - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:381-403.
An Analysis of U.S. Multinationals' Recruitment Practices in Mexico.Eileen Daspro - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):221 - 232.
The Priority of Democratic Autonomy Over Discriminatory Religion.Henry E. Cline - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:381-403.
Discrimination and the Presumptive Rights of Immigrants.José Jorge Mendoza - 2014 - Critical Philosophy of Race 2 (1):68-83.
What's so Bad about Discrimination?Shlomi Segall - 2012 - Utilitas 24 (1):82-100.
The Cultural Red King Effect.Cailin O'Connor - 2017 - Journal of Mathematical Sociology 41 (3).

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-04

Downloads
841 (#16,955)

6 months
136 (#23,609)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?