Secondary predicates and adverbials in Nilotic and Omotic: a typological comparison

In Nikolaus Himmelmann & Eva Schultze-Berndt (eds.), Secondary predication and adverbial modification: the typology of depictives. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 299 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Existentials, predication, and modification.Itamar Francez - 2009 - Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (1):1-50.
On depictive secondary predicates in Laz.S. Kutsscher & N. Sevim Genc - 2005 - In Nikolaus Himmelmann & Eva Schultze-Berndt (eds.), Secondary predication and adverbial modification: the typology of depictives. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 237.
Quantifying depictive secondary predicates in Australian languages.William McGregor - 2005 - In Nikolaus Himmelmann & Eva Schultze-Berndt (eds.), Secondary predication and adverbial modification: the typology of depictives. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 173--200.
Adverbials and depictives as restrictors.Thomas Müller-Bardey - 2005 - In Nikolaus Himmelmann & Eva Schultze-Berndt (eds.), Secondary predication and adverbial modification: the typology of depictives. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 107.
What is wrong with typological thinking?Tim Lewens - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (3):355-371.
Vague predicates and language games.Rohit Parikh - 1996 - Theoria 11 (3):97-107.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
28 (#538,947)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references