Gender differences in determining the ethical sensitivity of future accounting professionals

Journal of Business Ethics 15 (5):591 - 597 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores possible connections between gender and the willingness to tolerate unethical academic behavior. Data from a sample of 285 accounting majors at four public institutions reveal that females are less tolerant than males when questioned about academic misconduct. Statistically significant differences were found for 17 of 23 questionable activities. Furthermore, females were found to be less cynical and less often involved in academic dishonesty. Overall, the results support the finding of Betz et al. (1989) that the gender socialization approach dominates the structural approach

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Strategic Sensitivity and Its Impact on Boosting the Creative Behavior of Palestinian NGOs.Hamdan K. Muhammad, El Talla A. Suliman, J. Shobaki Mazen & Samy S. Abu-Naser - 2020 - International Journal of Academic Accounting, Finance and Management Research (IJAAFMR) 4 (5):80-102.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
92 (#197,672)

6 months
9 (#361,621)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?