Confucianism and Deweyan pragmatism: resources for a new geopolitics of interdependence

Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Over the past generation, the rise of East Asia and especially China, has brought about a sea change in the economic and political world order. At the same time, global warming, environmental degradation, food and water shortages, population explosion, and income inequities have created a perfect storm that threatens the very survival of humanity. It is clear now that the Westphalian model of individual sovereign states seeking their own self-interest will not be able to respond effectively to this win-win or lose-lose crisis. In this volume, a cadre of distinguished scholars comes together to reflect on Confucianism and Deweyan pragmatism as possible resources for a new geopolitics that begins from an ontology of interdependence and recognizes the irreducibly ecological nature of the human experience at every level. Both Confucian and Deweyan traditions emphasize the primacy of experience, the importance of vital relationality, and the moral roots of good governance. The potential benefits of conceptually blending the two are many. Indeed, the contemporary Chinese philosopher Tang Junyi provides us with a cosmological understanding of the "idea" of Confucianism that, in parallel to Dewey's "idea" of democracy, can enable us to anticipate the core values, if not the specific contours, of a "Confucian democracy." Just as Dewey's "idea" of democracy is his vision of the flourishing communal life made possible by the contributions of the uniquely distinguished persons that constitute it, Tang Junyi's Confucianism is a pragmatic naturalism directed at achieving the most highly integrated cultural, moral, and spiritual growth for the individual-in-community. In both, we find an affirmation of communal harmony as a process "starting here and going there" through which those involved learn together to do ordinary things in extraordinary ways. Just such a cosmological understanding of democracy is one way of describing what will be needed to address the many predicaments characterizing the environmental, cultural, socioeconomic, and political dynamics of the twenty-first century.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dissimilarities Between Deweyan Pragmatism and Confucianism.Russell Shen - 2012 - Paideusis: Journal of the Canadian Philosophy of Education Society 20 (1):24-32.
“Pragmatism and Confucian Empiricism".Barry Allen - 2021 - In Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism. pp. 40-48.
Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism: A Dialogue.Roger T. Ames - 2003 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 30 (3-4):403-417.
Confucianism and American Pragmatism.Mathew A. Foust - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (6):369-378.
Political Confucianism and the Politics of Confucian Studies.Eske J. Møllgaard - 2015 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 14 (3):391-402.
Way of post-confucianism: Transformation and genealogy. [REVIEW]Zhuoyue Huang - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (4):543-559.
Contemporary Challenges for Confucianism.Chenyang Li - 2012 - Journal of East-West Thought 1 (2):53-68.
A qigong interpretation of confucianism.Peimin Ni - 1996 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 23 (1):79-97.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-22

Downloads
7 (#1,201,127)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references