The Argument from Slips

In Andrei Buckareff, Carlos Moya & Sergi Rosell (eds.), Agency, Freedom, and Moral Responsibility. pp. 13-29 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophers of perception are familiar with the argument from illusion, at least since Hume formulated it to challenge a naïve form of realism. In this paper, I present an analogous argument but in the domain of action. It focuses on slips, a common kind of mistake. But, otherwise, it is structurally similar. The argument challenges some contemporary views about the nature of action inspired by Wittgenstein. The discussion shows how thinking about these common mistakes helps illuminate aspects of human agency that tend to be overlooked whenever too much emphasis is placed on the rationality of human actions.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Slips.Santiago Amaya - 2011 - Noûs 47 (3):559-576.
Slips of the tongue.Kathleen Emmett - 1989 - Philosophical Psychology 2 (2):203-222.
The Idea of a Necessary Connection.H. O. Mounce - 1985 - Philosophy 60 (233):381 - 388.
Categorization of action slips.Donald A. Norman - 1981 - Psychological Review 88 (1):1-15.
The Zisizi in the Jingmen Guodian Chu Slips.Li Xueqin - 2000 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 32 (2):61-67.
Pink Slips, Privilege, and Payback.Lester A. Myers - 2000 - Professional Ethics, a Multidisciplinary Journal 8 (3-4):123-180.
A brief explanation of the Chu bamboo slips.Zheng Wangeng - 2006 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):418-431.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-08-29

Downloads
279 (#75,009)

6 months
122 (#34,267)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Santiago Amaya
University of the Andes

Citations of this work

Two kinds of intentions: a new defense of the Simple View.Santiago Amaya - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (7):1767-1786.
Basic Actions Reloaded.Santiago Amaya - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (9):e12435.
Why value values?Murray Samuel - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41.
What it takes to make a word.Wade Munroe - 2022 - Synthese 200 (4):1-30.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Intention, plans, and practical reason.Michael Bratman - 1987 - Cambridge: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Intention.Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe - 1957 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Perception, Hallucination, and Illusion.William Fish - 2009 - New York, US: Oxford University Press.
Intention.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1957 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57:321-332.

View all 43 references / Add more references