Legal Justification by Optimal Coherence

Ratio Juris 24 (3):304-329 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the concept of coherence and its role in legal reasoning. First, it identifies some problem areas confronting coherence theories of legal reasoning about both disputed questions of fact and disputed questions of law. Second, with a view to solving these problems, it proposes a coherence model of legal reasoning. The main tenet of this coherence model is that a belief about the law and the facts under dispute is justified if it is “optimally coherent,” that is, if it is such that an epistemically responsible legal decision-maker would have accepted it as justified by virtue of its coherence in like circumstances. Last, looking beyond the coherence theory, the paper explores the implications of the version of legal coherentism proposed for a general theory of legal reasoning and rationality

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Formal models of coherence and legal epistemology.Amalia Amaya - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (4):429-447.
The role of coherence in legal reasoning.Barbara Baum Levenbook - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (3):355 - 374.
The role of coherence in epistemic justification.T. Shogenji - 2001 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (1):90 – 106.
Legal reasoning and legal theory revisited.Fernando Atria - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
The Incoherence of Coherence Theories.Richard Fumerton - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Research 19:89-102.
Coherentism.Peter Murphy - 2006 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-09

Downloads
129 (#142,684)

6 months
20 (#133,501)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Amalia Amaya
National Autonomous University Of Mexico