Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (12):690-692 (2006)
AbstractDespite its focus on consent the new Human Tissue Act 2004 allows for testing without consent where a relative could benefitIn recognition of the fact that genetic test results in people can have implications for close relatives, the new Human Tissue Act 2004 allows for a direction to access a person’s tissue so that testing can be carried out for the benefit of a relative, without the consent of that person. Clinical practice governed by common law and statute, before this act, acknowledged that the disclosure, without consent, of the results of a genetic test, is ethically permissible in extreme situations for the benefit of a relative. New testing for the benefit of a relative without donor consent challenges the principle that informed or adequate consent should be obtained before a genetic test with considerable predictive powers is carried out. The debate surrounding the analogous situation of HIV testing concluded that in very rare cases, disclosure of an HIV result without consent may be justified, but testing without consent is a professional misconduct. This part of the legislation is controversial and deserves further debate. The Human Tissue Authority should take measures to limit the potential harm that can be caused by this provision.IntroductionAfter much debate, the new Human Tissue Act 2004 was passed by parliament in November 2004. Implementation of this act may be staggered, but it will be fully operational in May 2006. This act has several provisions that have implications in clinical practice for the use of stored tissue or samples containing cells. These provisions allow the Human Tissue Authority to permit access to human tissue for the purpose of obtaining scientific or medical information about a person for the benefit of another family member, without the consent of the donor . …
Similar books and articles
Tis but a scratch: The human tissue act and the use of tissue for research, issues for research ethics committees.David Hunter - unknown
The privacy of tutankhamen – utilising the genetic information in stored tissue Samples.Søren Holm - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (5):437-449.
Informed Consent in Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing: The Outline of A Model between Specific and Generic Consent.Eline M. Bunnik, A. Cecile J. W. Janssens & Maartje H. N. Schermer - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (3):343-351.
A brief guide to the Human Tissue Act 2004.M. Brazier & S. Fovargue - 2006 - Clinical Ethics 1 (1):26-32.
The UK Human Tissue Act and consent: surrendering a fundamental principle to transplantation needs?M. D. D. Bell - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (5):283-286.
'Cooling corpses': Section 43 of the Human Tissue Act 2004 and organ donation.C. Sangster - 2007 - Clinical Ethics 2 (1):23-27.
Genetic testing: The appropriate means for a desired goal?Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (3):167-177.
‘Saviour Siblings’? The Distinction between PGD with HLA Tissue Typing and Preimplantation HLA Tissue Typing: Winner of the Max Charlesworth Prize Essay 2006.Crystal K. Liu - 2007 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (1):65-70.
Genetic Determinism and Discrimination: A Call to Re-Orient Prevailing Human Rights Discourse to Better Comport with the Public Implications of Individual Genetic Testing.Karen Eltis - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (2):282-294.
The Evolutionary Biological Implications of Human Genetic Engineering.Russell Powell - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):22.
Maternal serum testing: Is invasive testing a passing era.Marcia Riordan - 2012 - Bioethics Research Notes 24 (1):7.
Informed consent and Anonymous tissue Samples: The case of hiv seroprevalence studies.Loretta M. Kopelman - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (6):525-552.
Argumentation and risk communication about genetic testing: Challenges for healthcare consumers and implications for computer systems.Nancy L. Green - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):113-129.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Using biomarkers in acute medicine to prevent hearing loss: should this require specific consent?Peta Coulson-Smith & Anneke Lucassen - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (8):536-537.
Is there a duty to share genetic information?S. Matthew Liao - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):306-309.
References found in this work
No references found.