The Hindenburg Line of the Strauss wars

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (1):118-153 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bringing continental sensibilities and skill to his project, David Janssens has abandoned the line of defense heretofore used by North American intellectuals to shield Leo Strauss from criticism: Janssens wastes no time trying to prove Strauss was a liberal democrat, frankly admits his atheism, and emphasizes the continuity and European origins of his thought. Nevertheless committed to defending Strauss even at his most vulnerable points, Janssens is compelled to anchor his new defensive position on a misreading of what he calls "an inconspicuous footnote" in Philosophie und Gesetz (1935)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-02-13

Downloads
80 (#204,402)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William H.F. Altman
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (Alumnus)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Natural Right and History (Chicago, 1953).Leo Strauss - 1953 - The Correspondence Between Ethical Egoists and Natural Rights Theorists is Considerable Today, as Suggested by a Comparison of My" Recent Work in Ethical Egoism," American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (2):1-15.
Persecution and the art of writing.Leo Strauss - 1952 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Thoughts on Machiavelli.Leo Strauss - 1978 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

View all 44 references / Add more references