The Deontological Defense of Democracy: An Argument From Group Rights

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (3):279-293 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract: Democracy is regularly heralded as the only form of government that treats political subjects as free and equal citizens. On closer examination, however, it becomes apparent that democracy unavoidably restricts individual freedom, and it is not the only way to treat all citizens equally. In light of these observations, we argue that the non-instrumental reasons to support democratic governance stem, not from considerations of individual freedom or equality, but instead from the importance of respecting group self-determination. If this is correct, it implies that a state may choose democracy, but its right to self-determination means that it is also free, in principle, to decide in favor of some nondemocratic alternative.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The logic of Aboriginal Rights.Duncan Ivison - 2003 - Ethnicities 3 (3):321-44.
Henry Shue on Basic Rights: A Defense. [REVIEW]Jordan Kiper - 2011 - Human Rights Review 12 (4):505-514.
Are Cultural Group Rights against Individual Rights?Erol Kuyurtar - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:51-59.
Two Wrongs Don’t Make a Right.Rekha Nath - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (4):679-696.
Group Rights and Group Agency.Adina Preda - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (2):229-254.
Defense.Kai Draper - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 145 (1):69 - 88.
Pragmatism, democracy, and judicial review: Rejoinder to Posner.Ilya Somin - 2004 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 16 (4):473-481.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
96 (#176,350)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Andrew Altman
Georgia State University
Christopher Wellman
Washington University in St. Louis

Citations of this work

Defining the demos.Ben Saunders - 2012 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (3):280-301.
The Suspension Problem for Epistemic Democracy.Miguel Egler - forthcoming - Philosophical Quarterly.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references